, 2015; Cardoso and you will Souza, 2016; Santiago and you can Saliba, 2016; dos Santos and you will Jalalzai, 2021). Within performs we will work on misogyny as acknowledged by our very own interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s six many years for the fuel, particularly targeting the relationship anywhere between misogynistic backlash additionally the gendered twice join fictional character identified. On following the area we provide an even more nuanced meaning having all the subcategories understood (discover Desk 2), delivering stand-by yourself significance and you will examples regarding studies alongside detailed analyses of key minutes inside the Rousseff’s presidency you to exemplify the new vibrant ranging from our nuanced suggestion to have evaluating the gendered double join, misogynist backlash, and its effects on the Rousseff’s presidency.
The brand new five subcategories known appeared in the information in the differing levels (get a hold of Dining tables step three, 4). A couple layouts appeared in highest ratio: Investigations to Men and you will Misogynyments themed due to the fact analysis so you can guys featured in almost half all the interview and you may depicted thirty-six percent of all statements codifiedments themed due to the fact misogyny was the majority statements (38 per cent) and you will appeared in 44 percent of the many interview. This basically means, interviewees were very aware out of Rousseff’s character as the chairman in comparison to other men politicians and you may previous presidents, and the ways Rousseff was penalized throughout their particular management due to gendered presumption and backlash.
When you are lookin that have shorter regularity about interviews, the other several themes render extremely important framework to help you information you can sexist backlash for the presidency off Brazil’s very first lady president. Discussions precisely how Rousseff made an effort to conform to gendered standards ascribed to women (Complying towards Twice Bind) starred in over 10% of your remark coded and interviews held. At the same time, dialogue about precisely how Rousseff confronted the newest gendered expectations of their particular condition (Challenging new Double Join) appeared in more than that fifth of all of the interviews, constituting 16 % of all comments coded.
The newest malfunction of your numerical thickness of one’s thematic studies will bring a kick off point in order to an excellent qualitative investigation of every theme, centering on the connection between for every theme, particularly the partnership between the three layouts privately linked to the newest gendered double join (review, complying, and you can challenging) as well as the misogynistic backlash you to definitely then followed.
Comparison to help you dudes
One of the subcategories identified is actually contrasting from Dilma Rousseff to help you dudes, each other evaluating Rousseff so you can men people in politics and discussing exactly how things will be various other when the Rousseff was a man. Ergo, we discovered that there clearly was both an abstract parts and basic element of her analysis to guys. Within the an abstract feel, we quite often noticed the definition of, “if the she was in fact men” to spell it out how the right position might have played away differently had Dilma perhaps not been a lady. The brand new story illustrated inside our interviews is actually out of a network you to definitely “prefers guys” (Respondent 88, ), having “zero discover gender discrimination, nevertheless undeniable fact that [a beneficial politician] is a man was a plus” (Respondent 8, ). When sharing so it review far more concretely, there was a look closely at Rousseff’s rough character, the latest “hard lady around delicate men.” The fresh quotation lower than provides a great deal more perspective:
Conversations from the Rousseff’s impeachment additionally the sexism and you will misogyny trailing the fresh new techniques have been chatted about inside the common media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and Kaiser, 2016) and in scholarly functions (Zdebskyi mais aussi al
Yes, plus they asserted that she are a challenging person, that she cannot keep in touch with some body, you to she had an enthusiastic authoritarian way of talking. Everything that for men appears as a supplement “zero, he or she is a challenging people, a home-convinced person that understands what he desires.” In order to their unique was showed while the bad “no, she cannot know how to speak, she actually is tough, she actually is it” during the a poor way. How they talk to us, women. We have achieved a particular standing, we have been becoming harsh, the audience is deviating of to help you how to be a lady, who is sweet, transparent, quiet and you will like. The type of Dilma getting ‘s the type of women who have the ability to feel solid within a completely patriarchal globe, against it order you to is obtainable (Respondent 79, ).
